ࡱ> -/,a jbjb " :::::::NNNN ZzzzzzUUU,R(l:UUUUUi::zziiiU :z:ziN$r::::UiiQh::n N_ 0i i:NNCEPP Minutes February 20, 2007 In attendance: Beau Breslin (Chair), Jon Brestoff, Deb Hall, Matthew Hockenos, Pat Hilleren, Dan Nathan, Kyle Nichols (scribe), Pat Oles, and Heather Vickery. The minutes for the February 6 and February 13 meetings were approved. Pat Hilleren, Deb Hall, and Kyle Nichols reported to CEPP a summary of the discussion at Academic Staff meeting regarding motion on ID proportional lines. There were no major concerns about the motion. Most discussion centered on the procedures. Specifically, the 60/40 split between departments and programs (or some permutation thereof) was of most concern. The end result about percentage split was unresolved and CAPT will address that issue. CEPP did agree that the motion should include language expressing that proportional lines would increase the possibility of curricular innovation in departments and programs. The remainder of the meeting focused on the Writing Proposal. CEPP addressed each of the concerns raised by the faculty to date. There seemed to be several concerns from the Studio Art faculty. In order to understand and address these concerns Beau, along with other CEPP members, agreed to meet with the Art and Art History departments. Another concern that was raised was the ability for all students to meet the foundational requirement within the first two semesters. There are valid reasons why opportunity and international students might take three semesters to meet the foundational requirement. CEPP understands these complexities and Beau will draft a memo to HEOP and the Registrar suggesting that these students might take three semesters to meet the foundational requirement. A question arose about the ability of the English department to deliver enough sections (EN 105) to meet the foundational requirement in the two-semester goal. CEPP agreed that this was an institutional question and if the motion is passed the administration has to provide the resources necessary to meet this part of the proposal. CEPP also discussed the timeline of implementation of the proposal. Included in the timeline was the hiring of the Writing Director (WD) and timing of when the WD would submit and informative evaluation to the faculty (beginning of the 3rd year). CEPP discussed that the Expository Writing Requirement was one requirement with two parts, foundational (EN 105 or equivalent) and the departmental requirement, not two separate requirements. CEPP would double check the wording of the motion to make sure that this was properly conveyed. CEPP recognized that some faculty are concerned that the writing proposal could be interpreted differently in future years as committee personnel change. Lastly, Studio Art is concerned that other forms of communication are not properly recognized in the proposal. CEPP agreed to draft language to state that writing is one form of communication and that other forms may be addressed in the future.  h]khdH*h0vhdOJQJhdOJQJhdh0v  { | 8^8gddh^hgdd & Fgddgddgdd8^8gdd 1h/ =!"#$%H@H 0vNormal CJOJPJQJ_HmH sH tH DA@D Default Paragraph FontRiR  Table Normal4 l4a (k(No List  z z [  {|  0p0p0p0p0p 0p0p 0p0p0p0p 0p,/ov/l328,/ov/l328,/ov/l328,/ov/l328,/ov/l328,/ov/l328,/ov/l328,/ov/l328,/ov/l328,/ov/l328,/ov/l328,/ov/l328,/ov/l328,/ov/l328,/ov/l328,/ov/l328,/ov/l328,/ov/l328   8@0(  B S  ?  X$65u0+[,6IB $OcDrD\wKvh^`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh  ^ `OJQJo(hHhxx^x`OJQJo(hHhHH^H`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh  ^ `OJQJo(hHhxx^x`OJQJo(hHhHH^H`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hH808^8`0o(. ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH.h @ @ ^@ `o(hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.hpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhPP^P`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh ^`o(hH.h  ^ `OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHhxx^x`OJQJo(hHhHH^H`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hH,6IB$OcDu0+X$\w                  =~                          @6 P @UnknownGTimes New Roman5Symbol3 Arial3TimesYM New YorkTimes New Roman?1M Courier New;Wingdings"h2F2F2F  !r4d  3QHX)?0v CEPP Minutes Skidmore UserDeb Hall       Oh+'0 $ @ L X dpx'CEPP Minutes91 UserNormal Deb Hall2Microsoft Word 11.3@F#@HY_@|_@|_  ՜.+,0 hp  '91   CEPP Minutes Title  !"#%&'()*+.Root Entry FY_01TableWordDocument"SummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8$CompObjXObjectPoolY_Y_ FMicrosoft Word DocumentNB6WWord.Document.8