91暗网

91暗网 faculty members are encouraging students to take a deeper look at the role of the United States in the world by considering the international ramifications of events in the United States and global attitudes toward this country.  

A recent 91暗网 faculty panel, for instance, considered the presidency of Donald J. Trump and challenges raised to U.S. democracy during the siege of the Capitol earlier this year.  

The forum, titled 鈥淎ftershock: Global Views of U.S. Democracy After Trump,鈥� posed tough questions about the state of American democracy, perceptions of the United States from abroad and the notion of American exceptionalism.  

鈥淲hat happens in domestic politics in the United States has real-world implications for the world and, for instance, how democracy is perceived 鈥� the credibility of something like a democratic political system at the global level,鈥� said Mahesh Shankar, associate professor and director of the International Affairs Program. 鈥淭hose linkages need to be recognized."

You cannot pursue a democratic agenda abroad without also acknowledging democratic frailties at home.

Mahesh Shankar

associate professor and director of the International Affairs Program

Rodrigo Schneider, assistant professor of economics, explored the implications of Trump鈥檚 rhetoric for Brazil. Schneider noted that President Jair Bolsonaro often endorsed Trump鈥檚 baseless allegations of electoral fraud and used them to raise similar questions about Brazil鈥檚 own voting system.  

Schneider expressed concern that Bolsonaro, whose popularity has tumbled recently over his handling of the COVID-19 crisis, was likely to use arguments advanced by the Trump campaign during the 2020 U.S. elections as a playbook for 2022 elections in his own country.  

鈥淏razil鈥檚 institutions will be put to the test next year,鈥� Scheider said. 鈥淏olsonaro took to heart the example of how to follow a U.S. leader.鈥�

 

Jordana Dym, professor of history and director of Latin American and Latinx Studies, drew attention to the language used in the United States following the storming of the U.S. Capitol, including casual references by American politicians to the notion of a 鈥渂anana republic.鈥�  

Dym noted that the troubling term, which can be dated back to growing U.S. ascendency and imperialism in Latin America in the early 20th century, only came into common use many decades later during the Cold War.  

鈥淲ords really matter. The vocabulary that people, especially politicians, use has weight in the world,鈥� Dym said. 鈥淚t鈥檚 time to relearn history, time to reexamine the evidence, time to make very clear that when we鈥檙e making claims about other places ... that those claims may no longer reflect the realities of those places.鈥� 

Pushkala Prasad, professor of management and international affairs, considered views of the United States from the outside and how those views have affected U.S. presence in the world.  She described many foreign policymakers鈥� views 鈥� including those in allied nations 鈥� as 鈥渧acillating between a deep sense of unease and extreme irritation.鈥� 

鈥淲hat this translates to is a sense, in the long term, of the United States as an unreliable partner鈥� on issues such as the Iran nuclear deal, Prasad said. 鈥淭his is making countries in Europe, Australia, Japan, India, South Korea and Singapore extremely nervous about long-term relationships and forcing them not only to recalibrate their relationships with the United States but also to recalibrate their relationships with other countries .. In other words, they鈥檙e hedging their bets.鈥� 

Such attitudes are likely to diminish leadership in the long term, Prasad said. She also described increasing irritation over U.S. inability to tackle issues such as white supremacy and rampant conspiracy theories, which in some cases have spread to European nations.  

鈥淎merica, the much-fabled crucible of democracy, is becoming the site of a new anti-democratic virus that is infecting significant pockets in Europe 鈥� at least that is how many people see it,鈥� Prasad said.  

The March 17 event was moderated by Michael Orr, dean of the faculty and vice president of academic affairs.